Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 05:43

Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Who Will Replace Anna Wintour at ‘Vogue’? - The Cut
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Dollar surge could be short-lived after U.S. strike on Iran - CNBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
2025 NFL All-Paid Team: Saquon Barkley, Dak Prescott headline top earners by position - NFL.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Canadian businesses seek certainty in US tariff war - BBC
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Why does my crush make me jealous about having a girlfriend?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
The 'Japanese Walking' Fitness Trend Has Science-Backed Benefits - ScienceAlert